Using the equivalent of php trait

100%

Using the equivalent of php trait

✓ Published0🌍 Public

Last edited Mar 25, 2019

Created on Mar 25, 2019

This example demonstrates how to apply PHP-like traits to JavaScript objects using a custom `addMixin` function. It shows a flexible method for copying property descriptors from multiple source objects onto a target object, enabling code reuse without traditional inheritance. The function leverages `Object.keys`, `Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor`, and `Object.defineProperties` to transfer both regular and enumerable symbol-based properties. The implementation is adapted from Caleb Porzio’s approach, and the mixin.js file contains the complete logic for this composition pattern.

AI-generated description

Similar vizzes

Loading thumbnail…

Classes

This example shows how JavaScript classes can be constructed using three different patterns: functional, prototypal, and pseudoclassical. It uses plain JavaScript functions, the `Object.create` API, and the `new` keyword to demonstrate object creation and method delegation through the `Car.prototype` object. The code defines a `Car` class with a `move` method that increments a `loc` property, illustrating how each pattern achieves the same behavior with varying levels of syntactic convenience.

MMurithi

55% match

Loading thumbnail…

Prototype Chains

Prototype Chains demonstrates JavaScript’s prototype-based inheritance through a series of code excerpts. It shows property lookup behavior, including failed lookups returning `undefined`, and contrasts one-time copying with `extend()` against ongoing delegation using `Object.create()`. The example illustrates how a linked object (rose) delegates missing property lookups to its prototype (gold), while copied objects (blue) do not reflect later additions. It also introduces the object prototype, the top-level fallback providing shared methods like `toString` for all objects.

MMurithi

55% match

Loading thumbnail…

A set of pure and immutable ES2015 functions aimed to make functional JavaScript more idiomatic.

This example presents a collection of pure, immutable ES2015 utility functions for idiomatic functional JavaScript. It includes array operations such as `combine`, `compact`, `difference`, and `intersection`, object helpers like `merge` and `toMap`, math functions (`min`, `max`, `sum`, `product`), and function decorators including `curry`, `once`, `maybe`, and `pipeline`. The code relies on native JavaScript features like `Array.prototype.includes`, `Set`, `Map`, `Object.assign`, and spread syntax. No external libraries or data sources are used; the gist demonstrates standalone, reusable functional patterns.

JJaxonDvl

54% match

Loading thumbnail…

An approach to deep cloning objects in JavaScript

This example shows a recursive approach to deep cloning plain JavaScript objects, where each nested object is duplicated rather than shared by reference. The code defines a `cloneDeep` function that iterates over an object’s own enumerable properties using `Object.entries`, checks whether each value is an object with `typeof value === 'object'`, and if so, calls itself recursively; otherwise, it assigns the primitive value directly. The visualization likely demonstrates this process step by step, perhaps animating the traversal of a sample object tree. However, the code explicitly notes it does not support arrays, converting them into object-like structures with numeric keys, as seen in the comment about `['foo', 'bar']` becoming `{0: 'foo', 1: 'bar'}`. No external libraries are used—only native JavaScript methods and operators.

115Dkatz

53% match

Loading thumbnail…

Gist 247783

This visualization uses a single file of JavaScript notes to map three inheritance patterns in Douglas Crockford’s code—pseudoclassical, prototypal, and functional—as a branching, node-link diagram. The code renders each pattern as a cluster of objects and functions, with edges showing prototype chains and constructor relationships. It relies on native JavaScript APIs like `Object.create` and constructor functions, while the layout is drawn on an HTML canvas without external libraries. The source is a gist by DylanFM, and the visual emphasizes the structural differences between the patterns by positioning them in separate columns.

DDylanFM

53% match

Loading thumbnail…

please copy into repo

This example demonstrates array manipulation techniques in JavaScript, implementing utility functions such as `indexOf`, `sum`, `remove`, `append`, `truncate`, and `findAllOccurrences`. The code defines an object with methods that operate on arrays, including custom implementations for finding element positions, calculating sums, copying arrays without mutations, and detecting duplicates. The visualization relies on plain JavaScript array methods and loops, with the `exports` pattern exposing the functions for use in browser or Node environments. The source data consists of hardcoded test arrays, and the rendering approach uses no external libraries or graphical APIs.

NNikhilkuyya

52% match

Loading thumbnail…

Gist 7026512

This example demonstrates object-oriented JavaScript patterns for modeling zoo animals, showing how constructor functions and prototypes create shared behavior. The code defines an `Animal` constructor with `identify()` and `name()` methods on its prototype, while a `Zoo` object manages collections of animals. Although the zoo methods contain incomplete logic, the driver code tests animal identification, leg counts, and prototype method sharing across instances. The example uses plain JavaScript—no external libraries—relying on `console.log` for output and a custom `assert` function for validation. It illustrates inheritance and code reuse, though the zoo aggregation methods remain non-functional as written.

EElaineYu

52% match

Loading thumbnail…

Trying to learn to use objects created in JS

This example demonstrates JavaScript object-oriented programming using a custom `ToDo` constructor and prototype methods. The code defines a `ToDo` function that assigns an `action` property, then extends it with a `sayAction` method via the prototype. Two instances, `grace` and `mistyblunch`, are created and their `sayAction` methods are called, logging their respective action strings to the console. The script also directly accesses and logs the `action` properties of each object. It uses no external libraries or data sources, relying solely on native JavaScript object creation, constructor functions, and prototype-based inheritance to illustrate basic object behavior and property access.

MMistyBlunch

52% match