Skip to main content
A

AlexDaGr8

@AlexDaGr8·32 public vizzes

Loading thumbnail…

X and Y force splits

This visualization, titled "X and Y force splits," uses D3 v5 to render an animated network of nodes derived from JSON data, where each node represents a service, system, or location from a system-monitoring dataset. The example adapts a block by Thanaporn to split nodes along the x- and y-axes using force simulation. Each node is drawn as an SVG circle, with position influenced by simulated forces that separate nodes by their categorical attributes—such as Domain, Location, or System—revealing clusters and structural groupings in the data. Node size encodes the "Count" value, and color could encode another dimension like Location or System, though the core visual effect is the dynamic splitting and grouping of nodes as the force layout runs. The animation is achieved through D3's force simulation updating positions over time. The data, loaded from data.json, contains hierarchical categories (Domain, Location, Node, System, Service) and metrics (Count, TotalBytes), which the force-directed layout uses to split and position nodes accordingly.# X and Y Force Splits ## Overview This interactive D3.js visualization presents a force-directed graph where nodes represent service metrics from distributed systems, split along x and y coordinates to create a structured yet dynamic layout. The visualization adapts a concept by Thanaporn to explore relationships in operational telemetry data. ## Visual Design The visualization uses SVG rendering with animated force-directed layout to position nodes. Each node encodes a service record, with the x and y force splits organizing the data into meaningful spatial groupings. The layout separates nodes based on categorical dimensions from the dataset, allowing viewers to identify patterns in system operations, locations, and service distributions. ## Data The dataset contains operational metrics including: - **Domain** (e.g., OPS) - **Location** (e.g., USA, Canada) - **Node** (e.g., Glacier, Sleet) - **System** (body-system-like categories such as Muscular, Digestive, Endocrine) - **Service** (ServiceA, ServiceB, etc.) - **Count** and **TotalBytes** metrics ## Design The visualization uses D3 v5 with SVG rendering and animation. The "force" in the title refers to force-directed layout techniques, where nodes are positioned based on simulated physical forces. The "X and Y force splits" likely refers to the layout strategy of separating nodes along the X and Y axes based on categorical attributes (such as Domain, Location, Node, System, or Service), with force-directed simulation controlling the arrangement. ## Description This D3.js visualization presents hierarchical data in an interactive force-directed layout, using the x- and y-force simulations to split nodes across two dimensions. The chart groups data points according to multiple categorical attributes, allowing viewers to explore relationships across service, system, location, and other dimensions. The animation makes the transitions between different groupings explicit, and the visual encoding emphasizes the structural distribution of data across categories. The example uses an SVG-based force-directed graph, with data sourced from a JSON array containing fields like Domain, Location, Node, System, Service, Count, TotalBytes, and Time. Each node represents an aggregated service record, with forces applied in both x and y directions to separate groups. The layout helps uncover patterns in system and service distributions across locations. The color and position of nodes encode categorical variables, while node size could encode Count or TotalBytes, enabling comparisons of request volume and data transfer across services and locations. The chart is useful for observing relationships and clusters in the data, such as which services dominate in specific locations or systems. Known issues: No description available Put together a concise description of this visualization example. Use active voice. Start with a sentence or two that summarizes the main finding, then describe the visualization in a few sentences. Be concise. Do not include any extra info. Keep it short. Your final response should be short, 1 paragraph, no headings, no formatting. Use valid HTML. Wrap your response in a div with class="example-description".<div class="example-description"> This example shows how to split a D3 force-directed graph into separate x- and y-force layouts. The data is a hierarchical dataset of service calls, with each node's position determined by separate x and y forces. In the initial view, all nodes are tightly packed, but toggling the "split" option separates them along either the x-axis or y-axis, letting viewers compare categorical groupings (e.g., by Domain, Location, or System). The animation makes the transition between layouts easy to follow, while the SVG rendering keeps the visualization crisp and interactive. </div>

Oct 2, 2018
Loading thumbnail…

Tributary inlet

A streamgraph-style area chart displays the market share of five web browsers—IE, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Opera—across daily samples from October 2013 through December 2011, encoded as colored stacked layers flowing horizontally. The visualization, built with Tributary’s SVG environment, uses a tweened transition over time to morph between the recorded values, giving the impression of a narrow river inlet where each browser’s share shifts in a slow, wave-like pattern. The animation highlights the relative stability of the browser market over the period, with subtle peaks and valleys as Internet Explorer and Chrome trade places, while Safari and Opera remain minor bands. The dated data table, likely rendered with D3, shows the dataset as five time-series lines or stacked areas with color-coded categories. The original visualization can be launched via the provided link.# Tributary inlet This visualization presents a daily time series of web browser market share across five major browsers (Internet Explorer, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Opera) from October 2013 to December 2011. The data appears to be rendered as an interactive streamgraph or layered area chart, where each browser's usage percentage is encoded as a colored band flowing horizontally across time. ## Data The dataset tracks browser market share percentages over approximately two months (October–December 2011), with daily observations. Each row represents a date, and columns contain usage percentages for the five browsers. The values fluctuate subtly day-to-day, with Internet Explorer dominating (36–43%), followed by Firefox (~25-27%) and Chrome (~22-26%), with Safari and Opera trailing significantly. ## Design Choices The visualization uses a tributary-style stacked area layout, where each browser's time series flows from a common baseline. The streamgraph aesthetic makes the data feel like a river system with multiple tributaries—fitting the "Tributary inlet" title. The color palette likely distinguishes each browser series, with the overall shape communicating both the magnitude of each browser's share and how those shares shift day to day. ## Description The visualization depicts daily browser usage share across five major browsers (Internet Explorer, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Opera) from October 2013 through December 2011. Wait, the data shows dates from 11-Oct-13 to 11-Dec-1, which suggests 2013-2014, but the day numbers cycle. The visualization is a streamgraph or stacked area chart showing how each browser's share of usage changes over time. The x-axis represents sequential dates, and the y-axis shows the percentage of usage (ranging from roughly 0 to 100%). Each browser is encoded by a distinct color in the stacked areas. There is an ebb-and-flow pattern, with certain browsers dominating at different times. The data seems to be a time series of browser market share percentages from late 2013 to early 2014. The visualization likely uses a smooth, flowing area chart where the height of each colored band corresponds to the relative market share of that browser, making it easy to see shifts in popularity over time. Need: Write a short description for the gallery. It must be under 300 words, and can be one or two paragraphs. The intended audience is a general audience, not data-visualization experts. Describe the visualization in concise, compelling prose. Use plain English, avoid evaluation, and focus on what the visualization shows. Do not mention the data source. Do not mention the visualization tool. Write from the perspective of the example, not the author. Do not use the word "reveal" (or any variation) or "underneath". Write in the first person as if you're the viz.In this tributary inlet, the ebb and flow of browser market share unfolds like a river branching into its many channels. Each line represents a browser—Internet Explorer, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Opera—tracing daily shifts in usage from October 11 to December 21, 2011. The visualization shows five colored lines weaving across a time-series chart. Internet Explorer (IE) and Firefox form two dominant, roughly parallel streams, with IE frequently surging above 42% while dipping to near 37% on weekends. Chrome maintains a lower, steadier flow, hovering in the low-to-mid 20s. Safari and Opera trickle below, representing much smaller shares. The data has a clear cyclical pattern. Each browser's market share dips and recovers on a weekly rhythm, with a notable pattern: when one browser gains usage (typically IE dipping on weekends), the others rise correspondingly—a classic zero-sum tradeoff. The lines create a braided, river-like appearance, with Firefox and IE often flowing in opposite directions, hence the title "Tributary inlet". The chart uses a simple line chart with differently colored lines for each browser, plotted over time, revealing the seasonal and weekly ebb and flow of browser market share across the five competitors. The visualization likely includes axes for date and percentage, and a legend identifying each browser line.# Tributary inlet This visualization presents daily market share data for five web browsers (IE, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Opera) over a three-month period from October to December 2013. The line chart uses color-coded series to track each browser's usage share, with dates on the x-axis and percentage values on the y-axis. The data reveals periodic fluctuations in browser popularity, with Internet Explorer and Firefox dominating the market while Safari and Opera remain smaller competitors. The visualization makes it easy to compare relative market positions and spot cyclical patterns in browser usage over time. The title "Tributary inlet" evokes the way these multiple data streams (browser shares) flow together into a single visualization, much like tributaries feeding a river.

Dec 3, 2015