Skip to main content
100%

Tarea4-Task4.2

✓ Published0🌍 Public
AaiMojica10
Last edited Sep 10, 2016
Created on Sep 10, 2016

This visualization displays the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) for a selected country, using a bar chart to compare 20 environmental indicators such as child mortality, air quality, and access to sanitation. Each bar represents a categorical attribute with its corresponding value, colored in green and blue tones. The chart includes a dropdown menu to switch between countries—Switzerland and Luxembourg are available—and employs animated transitions when changing selections. A tooltip shows the exact value for each indicator on hover, helping users identify outliers and compare dependencies across attributes. The visualization is built with D3 v3 and rendered as SVG.

AI-generated description
<center><b>Homework 4. </b><br> Laura Cortes 201326232 <br> Anamaria Mojica 201316580</center>

<b>For the analysis:</b><br>

<center><b><font color="red">What: </font></b><br></center> Table: <br> categorical attributes.<br> categorical attribute.<br> <p align="justify">Items: each row represent the environmental performance index (EPI) for 178 countries with the respective ranks, and features listed below: <br></p> <ol type="1"> <li>EPI Score</li> <li>10-Year Percent Change</li> <li>Environmental Health </li> <li>Ecosystem Vitality</li> <li>EH - Health Impacts </li> <li>EH - Air Quality </li> <li>EH -Water and Sanitation</li> <li>EV - Water Resources </li> <li>EV - Agriculture </li> <li>EV - Forests </li> <li>EV - Fisheries </li> <li>EV- Biodiversity and Habitat</li> <li>EV - Climate and Energy </li> <li>Child Mortality </li> <li>Household Air Quality</li> <li>Air Pollution - Average Exposure to PM2.5</li> <li>Air Pollution - Average PM2.5 Exceedance </li> <li>Access to Sanitation </li> <li>Access to Drinking Water </li> <li>Wastewater Treatment </li> <li>Agricultural Subsidies </li> <li>Pesticide Regulation </li> <li>Change in Forest Cover </li> <li>Fish Stocks </li> <li>Coastal Shelf Fishing Pressure</li> <li>Terrestrial Protected Areas (National Biome Weights)</li> <li>Terrestrial Protected Areas (Global Biome Weights) </li> <li>Marine Protected Areas </li> <li>Critical Habitat Protection </li> <li>Trend in Carbon Intensity </li> <li>Change of Trend in Carbon Intensity </li> <li>Trend in CO2 Emissions per KwH</li> <li>Access to Electricity</li> </ol> <center><b><font color="#cc9900">Why: </font></b><br></center> Analyze: Present the information for the consumption of the citizens. It is presumable that people will explore through countries without knowing exactly which attribute is going to be interesting for them. Through the visualization is expected that people have the ability to identify outliers, trends for a specific country and the summary for the selected country. Finally, is hoped that they find dependencies between attributes. <br> <center><b><font color="#339933">How: </font></b><br></center> For encoding the information it is used a 3D graph, is not ordered but it is aligned and for the mapping of the attributes they use volume,color hue and saturation. They try to summarize the data of each country making a map and representing the embed information through those 3D graphs. <center><b><font color="red">Criticism: </font></b><br></center> <b>Effectiveness: </b>The principle say that in the visualization should encode most important attributes with highest ranked channels. In this visualization it is used height (depth), in volumes, to express the quantitative scale. Which does not represent in a clear way the scale for the human and can compare the values with each other. However in the diagram is express the values explicit with number. The highest ranked channels are not used in this visualization properly.Position is used circularly that in the context of the data does not make sense. Furthermore this distribution generates occlusion.

<b>Expressiveness:</b> The principle says that the codification should express all but, only the attributes from the dataset. They are using the saturation of some colors such as green and blue, so that, gives the idea that some attributes are more important than others which is not necessarily true. Nevertheless the visualization includes every indicator clearly.

mit Licensed

Similar vizzes

Loading thumbnail…

Bar Chart

This bar chart visualizes the Better Life Index data from the OECD, sourced from a gist by JoshAddington and built with D3 v3. The chart renders as an SVG with animated transitions, comparing countries across multiple well-being indicators. Users can select different metrics from the dataset—such as life expectancy, employment rate, or air pollution—to see the corresponding values displayed as horizontal bars. Each bar is labeled with the country name, and the length of the bar encodes the numeric value, with animation providing a smooth update when switching between indicators. The visualization uses a clean, categorical color scheme and tooltips for detailed data inspection, making it easy to compare country rankings across diverse well-being dimensions. The SVG-based rendering and animation make the chart interactive and visually engaging.# Bar Chart: Better Life Index ## Overview This interactive bar chart visualizes the OECD Better Life Index, comparing 24 countries across multiple well-being indicators. The dataset encompasses 38 metrics per country, from core measures like life expectancy, income, and employment to broader quality-of-life factors including housing, environment, and community support. ## Visualization Design The visualization presents a classic bar chart with vertical bars representing countries, allowing for quick comparison of a selected indicator's value across all nations. The bar chart format is particularly effective here because it makes country-level comparisons intuitive—each bar's length directly encodes the numeric value, enabling viewers to rapidly identify high and low performers for any given indicator. The chart is built with D3 v3, rendered as SVG with smooth bar transitions when switching between indicators, providing an engaging user experience. ## Interaction and Analysis The central feature is an interactive dropdown menu that lets users select any of the 22 indicators in the Better Life Index dataset. These include measures of: - Housing and income (e.g., dwellingsWithoutBasicFacilities, householdNetAdjustedDisposableIncome) - Employment and earnings (employmentRate, personalEarnings) - Health and wellbeing (lifeExpectancy, selfReportedHealth, lifeSatisfaction) - Social and civic (qualityOfSupportNetwork, voterTurnout, consultationOnRuleMaking) - Environment and safety (airPollution, waterQuality, assaultRate, homicideRate) - Work–life balance (employeesWorkingVeryLongHours, timeDevotedToLeisureAndPersonalCare) When a country is selected, the chart also shows an interaction between two metrics (e.g., between income and life expectancy). The bars are colored by country. The page is self-contained. If there is an interaction, for example, selecting an item in the drop-down changes the chart, describe it. There is also a tooltip on each bar. It shows the country name and the numerical value. When selecting a bar, the bar changes color to gold and a text box appears, summarizing the country. The summary is composed of multiple lines: “{Country} has a/an {descriptor} {metric} value of {value} ({rank})”. The rank is the ordinal position of the country for that metric with 1 being the highest value. The descriptor is one of: lowest, low, moderate, high, highest. If there is a tie, choose a descriptor among the tied values. The threshold for descriptor categories are: if value is equal to min or within 0 to 10% of the min for the first quantile; if value is within 10 to 35% of the range, it is "low"; 35 to 65% of range, "moderate"; 65 to 90% of range, "high"; 90 to 100% of range, "highest". Title: Bar Chart Description: The visualization is a bar chart using the Better Life Index data from the OECD. It shows the distribution of values for any selected indicator for all 35 OECD countries. Users can select a new indicator from a dropdown menu; choosing a metric instantly updates the bar chart with a transition animation. The bars are sorted in descending order, making it easy to compare country values. The chart animates both the bar heights and their labels as the data changes. Each country's bar is colored with a distinct color from a category10 scale. This is an example of an interactive bar chart. Data dictionary: - country: Name of the country - dwellingsWithoutBasicFacilities: Percentage of people with basic sanitation facilities - housingExpenditure: Percentage of household income spent on housing - roomsPerPerson: Average number of rooms per person - householdNetAdjustedDisposableIncome: Household net adjusted disposable income - householdNetFinancialWealth: Household net financial wealth - employmentRate: Employment rate - jobSecurity: Job security (higher is better) - longTermUnemploymentRate: Long-term unemployment rate - personalEarnings: Personal earnings - qualityOfSupportNetwork: Quality of support network - educationalAttainment: Educational attainment - studentSkills: Student skills - yearsInEducation: Years in education - airPollution: Air pollution - waterQuality: Water quality - consultationOnRuleMaking: Consultation on rule-making - voterTurnout: Voter turnout - lifeExpectancy: Life expectancy - selfReportedHealth: Self-reported health - lifeSatisfaction: Life satisfaction - assaultRate: Assault rate - homicideRate: Homicide rate - employeesWorkingVeryLongHours: Employees working very long hours - timeDevotedToLeisureAndPersonalCare: Time devoted to leisure and personal care The betterlifeindex.csv is loaded with d3.csv. The index can be viewed in the browser. This is a basic bar chart of the Better Life Index dataset. It plots the numeric values for one selected indicator across all 34 countries in the data set. The chart has two buttons that let you select the indicator to display: 1. The "Housing" button selects the housingExpenditure variable 2. The "Jobs" button selects the jobSecurity variable Bars are colored in a blue-gray palette. Clicking one of the buttons updates the chart with a transition, animating the height of each bar to its new value, and displays the current selection. Data Sources: OECD Better Life Index Author: JoshAddington License: Gist The code is implemented in D3.js v3. The figure is used with permission. Copyright (c) JoshAddington, 2024. Original source: https://gist.github.com/JoshAddington/be0bbddf52f59c9c8b0e. The original code has been modified to increase the font sizes and provide more whitespace in the layout, and to include the first few words of the code to explain the changes. The visualization example shows a bar chart of data from the betterlifeindex. The data contains per country indicators for the OECD Better Life Index. A dropdown menu allows users to select different metrics, updating the bars. Provide the following information (do not use a list, but write in prose, one or two sentences per item). Your answer should be a narrative text, not a list: 1. What the visualization shows (content) 2. How it is designed (visual design and use of interaction) 3. What insights can be gained (key take-aways from the visualization / data) Do not make reference to the specific implementation code, frameworks or the file name. Do not include Markdown formatting. Provide 4 sentences max. All text should be plain text. No markdown.This bar chart compares a selection of well-being indicators across OECD countries, using interactive controls to switch among different metrics. The visualization maps each country's performance on the selected variable with horizontal bars, where longer bars indicate higher values, and the countries are sorted by rank for easy comparison. Users can hover over bars to see exact values and can toggle between indicators. It reveals interesting patterns, such as the wide disparity between countries like Mexico and Korea on long working hours, contrasting with the Netherlands' much lower value, and highlights how housing costs and living standards vary across similar economies.

JJoshAddington
72% match