Gist 6730488c51af3208a17c

100%

Gist 6730488c51af3208a17c

✓ Published0🌍 Public

Last edited Feb 2, 2016

Created on Feb 2, 2016

This example visualizes a JavaScript function that checks whether all characters in the second string appear within the first string. It uses plain JavaScript array methods, including `indexOf` and a loop that pushes results into an array. The code then iterates through those results to return `true` if any character match is found or `false` otherwise. The visualization likely displays the function’s output for the given test case, `mutation(["hello", "oen"])`, without any external charting or rendering libraries.

AI-generated description

Similar vizzes

Loading thumbnail…

Gist 215171539b05b8928b7a

This example demonstrates a JavaScript function that checks whether all characters from one string appear in another, returning a boolean based on the comparison. The code defines `mutation(arr)`, which takes an array of two strings, converts both to lowercase, and iterates through the second string’s characters using a `for` loop with `indexOf` to test for presence. However, the logic incorrectly returns `true` or `false` immediately after checking the first character, rather than evaluating the entire string. The example calls the function with `["hello", "oen"]` and relies on native JavaScript string methods rather than any visualization library or rendering API.

SSSabu

85% match

Loading thumbnail…

Freecodecamp

This visualization demonstrates the outcome of a string-mutation algorithm, showing whether two input words share all their characters. The code defines a function that checks if every letter in the second word appears in the first, returning a boolean result. The example specifically tests the words "hello" and "hey," which produces a false output because the letter "y" is missing from the first word. No external visualization libraries are used; instead, the display relies on the raw JavaScript logic and the console output from the gist. The data source is the hardcoded array passed to the function.

EEelsie

73% match

Loading thumbnail…

Gist ed016e61300636e5a809

This example presents a JavaScript quiz that tests understanding of type coercion, string concatenation, and array manipulation. The visualization shows a series of code samples with their expected return values and written explanations, demonstrating behaviors like `typeof` returning "number" for `NaN`, string concatenation with numbers, and the effects of `pop()`, `push()`, `unshift()`, `join()`, and `split()`. The data is a static Gist containing plain text code questions and answers, rendered as a linear educational reference. No external libraries or frameworks are used; it relies purely on the raw text structure of the gist.

RRyan-321

59% match

Loading thumbnail…

Freecodecamp

This example visualizes the logic of a function called `slasher` through two alternative implementations. It shows how array slicing and splicing can be used to return a truncated array, with the first version mutating the original via `splice` and the second using `slice` to create a new array. The code renders the function definitions and their invocation results as a static code display, relying on no external libraries or graphics APIs—the visualization is purely textual, presenting the JavaScript source and its output. The data source is the embedded code itself, highlighting the difference between mutating and non-mutating array methods.

EEelsie

59% match

Loading thumbnail…

solution for http://toys.usvsth3m.com/javascript-under-pressure/ - ugly code

This example visualizes the structure of a JavaScript code challenge, using the `flatten` helper and `Object.prototype.toString` to identify nested arrays and numbers. It shows how the code recursively flattens an arbitrary array and sums all integers via `reduce`, while separate functions handle integer doubling, parity checks, file extension extraction, and longest string identification. The visualization likely renders the code’s control flow or function relationships, though the provided snippet does not include any drawing or charting libraries. The data source is the inline JavaScript functions from the gist, with no external rendering API visible.

TTBD

59% match

Loading thumbnail…

Gist 5969a606f59c3a8ca7f28d9eebaa89d5

This example shows a JavaScript function called `quickCheck` that is intended to search an array for a given element. The code uses a `for` loop and the `Array.indexOf` method to iterate through the array, though the loop’s logic is incomplete and does not yet return a result. It targets a console output via `console.log` to test the function with an array of vegetables and a search term. No external libraries are used; the code relies solely on native JavaScript array methods.

MMistyBlunch

58% match

Loading thumbnail…

Eloquent JS: Chapter 9

This example demonstrates regular expression patterns from Chapter 9 of Eloquent JavaScript, testing and replacing text in a console. It uses JavaScript’s native `RegExp` methods like `test`, `exec`, and `replace` to match patterns such as car/cat, quoted phrases, and INI configuration parsing. The visualization renders results in an SVG-based React interface using D3 v5, displaying matched strings and substitution outputs as static text elements within the 960×500 canvas.

Eemberix@gmail.com

56% match

Loading thumbnail…

1.10 Pure functions

This example demonstrates the concept of pure functions in JavaScript by comparing operations on arrays and age-checking functions. It shows how `slice()` preserves the original array, returning the same result each time, while `splice()` mutates the array, producing different outputs on repeated calls. The code also contrasts an impure `checkAge` function that relies on an external `minimum` variable against a pure version with the variable defined inside. Using CodePen’s built-in console, the visualization visually juxtaposes these behaviors, highlighting the benefits of cacheability, portability, and testability.

DDDDDDanica

56% match