Exercise: Implement FizzBuzz (Super Edition)

100%

Exercise: Implement FizzBuzz (Super Edition)

✓ Published0🌍 Public

Last edited Jul 28, 2013

Created on Jul 27, 2013

This example visualizes the transformation of an input array of integers through the FizzBuzz logic, displaying the resulting array where multiples of three are replaced with “Fizz,” multiples of five with “Buzz,” and multiples of both with “FizzBuzz.” The code, written in Ruby, implements two versions: an initial hash-based iteration that maps each index to its processed value, and a more concise solution using `Array#map!` to mutate the array in place. The visualization does not employ external libraries or rendering frameworks; instead, it relies solely on Ruby’s core array and hash methods to compute and output the final sequence, making the data flow explicit through the two algorithmic approaches.

AI-generated description

Similar vizzes

Loading thumbnail…

FizzBuzz with simple mapping operator

This example demonstrates the FizzBuzz logic through a simple mapping operator, rendering the output sequence from 1 to 15 as a compact text visualization. The code uses the XQuery 3.0 `!` mapping operator to iterate over each number, applying a chain of conditional `mod` checks to classify values as “fizz,” “buzz,” or “fizz buzz.” The data source is the hardcoded range (1 to 15), and the rendering approach is direct string output, with no external libraries or graphical APIs involved. It shows how a classic programming puzzle can be expressed concisely using functional-style iteration and conditional logic in a single line.

CCliffordAnderson

78% match

Loading thumbnail…

Fizz Buzz in XQuery

This example demonstrates the classic Fizz Buzz logic, where numbers divisible by 3 and 5 are replaced with the word "fizzbuzz", those divisible by only 3 with "fizz", and those divisible by only 5 with "buzz". The code iterates over a fixed range of integers from 1 to 30 using an XQuery `for` loop. It applies nested `if`/`else` expressions to evaluate the modulo conditions (`$i mod 3` and `$i mod 5`) and returns the appropriate string or the original number. The entire computation is performed entirely within XQuery 3.0, with no external libraries or data sources involved.

CCliffordAnderson

71% match

Loading thumbnail…

Eloquent JS: Chapter 2

This example showcases the output of four JavaScript programming exercises from Chapter 2 of *Eloquent JavaScript*, rendered directly in the browser console. It demonstrates looping with `for` and `while` statements to print a triangular pattern of `#` symbols, the FizzBuzz sequence with conditional `if`/`else` logic, and a chessboard grid built through nested loops. The code uses plain JavaScript with `console.log` for output, and the accompanying HTML page uses inline CSS for styling. No external libraries are used, focusing purely on core language syntax and algorithmic thinking.

Eemberix@gmail.com

62% match

Loading thumbnail…

Gist 119211

This example visualizes the Mandelbrot set as a fixed ASCII-art plot in a terminal, using Ruby’s `Complex` class to iterate the function `z*z + c` fifty times per point. The code samples a 2D grid over the complex plane—x from -2.0 to 0.5 and y from 1.0 to -1.0—and prints an asterisk when the final magnitude is less than 2, otherwise a space. It shows a symmetric, high-level fractal silhouette rendered entirely with text characters, with no graphical libraries involved. The rendering approach relies on nested `step` loops and `Array.new(50,a).inject` to perform the iteration, producing the classic bulb-and-spiral structure directly in the console output.

DDylanFM

57% match

Loading thumbnail…

Gist 23733

This example visualizes the distinction between local variables, instance variables, and block scoping in Ruby through a sequence of short code snippets. It shows how assignment semantics affect values across method calls and blocks, culminating in a Numeric class monkey-patch. The visualization likely renders each snippet as annotated code blocks with output values, using a custom layout or a library like D3.js to arrange the snippets and highlight variable bindings. The data originates from the gist’s source code, presented without external datasets, focusing on the logic of variable scope rather than numerical or spatial data.

DDylanFM

56% match

Loading thumbnail…

Freecodecamp

This example visualizes the process of refactoring a JavaScript function that returns the largest number from each sub-array in a nested array. It shows three successive code versions—using `Math.max.apply`, the spread operator with `Math.max(...arr[i])`, and a manual nested loop—to achieve the same result. The code relies on standard JavaScript array methods and the `Math.max` API, with no external libraries. The visualization likely renders the code side-by-side or as a sequence, highlighting syntax differences and algorithmic approaches. The data source is the hardcoded sample array passed to each function call, demonstrating how the output remains identical across implementations.

EEelsie

56% match

Loading thumbnail…

Gist b0f64c51570ca06b6602

This example demonstrates a recursive Boggle word-finding algorithm that visualizes its search process by printing the game board to the console at each step. The code uses Ruby’s `Array#each_with_index` to scan the 4x4 letter grid, and recursively calls the `checker` method to trace valid adjacent letter paths for a given word. A `draw` function outputs the board state, marking previously visited cells with the string `"NO"` to show the algorithm’s backtracking. The visualization relies on terminal text output rather than graphical rendering, using only the `p` method for display.

AAndrelton

56% match

Loading thumbnail…

Freecodecamp

This example visualizes the logic of a function called `slasher` through two alternative implementations. It shows how array slicing and splicing can be used to return a truncated array, with the first version mutating the original via `splice` and the second using `slice` to create a new array. The code renders the function definitions and their invocation results as a static code display, relying on no external libraries or graphics APIs—the visualization is purely textual, presenting the JavaScript source and its output. The data source is the embedded code itself, highlighting the difference between mutating and non-mutating array methods.

EEelsie

56% match