This example shows the results of running a Cucumber feature file twice: once with the `require` statement left as-is, and once after replacing it with the file’s contents. The terminal output displays a failing scenario with two skipped steps in the first run, followed by a passing scenario with two passing steps in the second. The visualization highlights the difference in outcome by pairing the two command-line outputs, each labeled with the cucumber command and profile. It demonstrates how a simple code substitution—in this case, inlining a required file—affects test execution, using the Ruby testing framework and its command-line interface.